| 1 |
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Santiago M. Mola wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> I don't think we're in a hurry for this feature, so I don't see the |
| 5 |
>> need of using suboptimal hacks in order to avoid an EAPI bump. |
| 6 |
>> Furthermore, EAPI 2 is supposed to be done in the near future, right? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Regards, |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I don't view the RESTRICT=live idea as "suboptimal" or "a hack" in |
| 11 |
> any way. I see it as a legitimate use of an existing ebuild variable |
| 12 |
> that's already used for lots of other legitimate purposes. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Let me rephrase the point as that this method should not be favoured |
| 16 |
over others just because it doesn't require an EAPI bump. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Regards, |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Santiago M. Mola |
| 21 |
Jabber ID: cooldwind@×××××.com |
Archives