| 1 |
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Jacob Godserv <jacobgodserv@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> The problem here, I think, is everyone has their opinion about what it |
| 3 |
> means for something to go stable, and I haven't seen more than one or |
| 4 |
> two references to what has been predetermined as policy for |
| 5 |
> stabilization. I think we should do a little less debating over |
| 6 |
> personal opinions (which is a "hot" topic, apparently) and more about |
| 7 |
> how Gentoo guidelines determine what can go stable. If the guidelines |
| 8 |
> don't cover this, then they ought to be fixed. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The opinions of most of the people in this thread are not directly |
| 11 |
relevant anyway. The maintainer gets to decide when to file a |
| 12 |
stablereq bug for their package and the arch teams to get to decide |
| 13 |
whether to mark something stable on their arch or not. So someone |
| 14 |
just make a decision and move forward; we will never reach consensus |
| 15 |
here (and we should not be trying to reach one anyway.) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-A |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> Jacob |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> "For then there will be great distress, unequaled |
| 24 |
> from the beginning of the world until now — and never |
| 25 |
> to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut |
| 26 |
> short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the |
| 27 |
> elect those days will be shortened." |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Are you ready? |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
Archives