Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Achim Gottinger <achim@g.o>
To: Johannes Findeisen <mailman@×××××.org>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc without ada,f77,objc ?
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 18:27:55
Message-Id: 006601c2b4f0$1406b5d0$6401a8c0@win2000
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc without ada,f77,objc ? by Johannes Findeisen
1 >
2 > hi achim,
3 >
4 > <snip>
5 > > I agree and already too a short look. looks like all these packages need
6 > > gcc-core and the additional sub-package.
7 > > how do you think about an eclass for these builds?
8 > </snip>
9 >
10 Hi Johannes,
11
12 the problem ist that gcc (the binary) must be build with java,fortran,ada
13 support,
14 otherwise gcj... do not work, so it's not possible to use the separated
15 tarballs.
16 The only optimization might be to use separate packages for the
17 (java,fortran,ada)
18 libs and stick with use vars for the gcc built-in stuff. I agree with the
19 guys which want
20 private use flags like for mozilla otherwise we're in trouble with the
21 allready existing java use
22 flag.
23 As an alternative the gcc-related java use flag can be called javac or gjc,
24 fortran and ada should not make problems.
25
26 >
27 > in my opinion, the standard gcc ebuilds should be there for bootstrapping.
28 is
29 > it possible to use the intel c++ compiler icc for bootstrapping?
30
31 have not even given icc a try so i simply dont know at the moment, you might
32 want to take
33 a look in the bootstrap.sh script and modify it to install icc++ after the
34 second gcc build.
35
36 i tried last week to make a separate package for the binutils and gcc stuff.
37 it uses gcc-core and builds
38 binutils and gcc(one-step no bootstrapping) together. This can be used as a
39 replacement for the first binutils/gcc build during
40 bootstrapping and saves some time.
41
42 >
43 > if this is possible then we could decide to use the gcc compiler without
44 > java,f77 etc... during the bootstrap process.
45 >
46 > i've looked for you on irc but you didn't were there.
47 > i've seen that you have retired from the gentoo dev team... is it true???
48
49 yeah, i ran out of money two years ago because i only worked on gentoo
50 for 14 month without getting sponsors or making it a sellable (and of course
51 without looking for other part time jobs). Additionally daniel and i
52 had alot of communication trouble after sticking together on this project
53 for such a long time.
54 these troubles are out of the way now but i'm abit short in time now, that's
55 why you will not see
56 me on irc (it eats time) and that's why i'm labled as an hall of fame
57 developer (a title, i personally really like).
58
59 bye achim~
60
61
62 --
63 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc without ada,f77,objc ? Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc without ada,f77,objc ? Johannes Findeisen <mailman@×××××.org>