Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New RESTRICT=live value for identification of live ebuilds?
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:12:04
Message-Id: 48943303.2050501@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New RESTRICT=live value for identification of live ebuilds? by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
5 > 2008-08-02 04:02:48 Zac Medico napisaƂ(a):
6 > The names of other RESTRICT values are related to features which are
7 > restricted. The new proposed value is intended for live ebuilds so its
8 > name should be negation of this feature. I think that something like
9 > RESTRICT=constant-sources would be better.
10
11 Honestly I don't care about whatever the convention is but if people
12 prefer some other name then that fine with me because the name
13 really makes no difference to me.
14
15 Zac
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
18
19 iEYEARECAAYFAkiUMwEACgkQ/ejvha5XGaPMJQCfR9L0OWipq1Mi3n8SrcOG5SdI
20 ZekAoLV/JMLaA7Om2RbxfhTIgdX0nqmi
21 =I0P1
22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----