| 1 |
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
| 2 |
<Arfrever@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a): |
| 4 |
>> So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news |
| 5 |
>> item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest |
| 6 |
>> that users not needing it may wish to package.mask it themselves, with a |
| 7 |
>> link to documentation with specific instructions and a bit more detail on |
| 8 |
>> why they might wish to mask it and under what circumstances they might not. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> I'd suggest an unmasking date 30 days after the release of the news item. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Python 3 is not masked. The discussion is about stabilization. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Duncan's comments still apply, though, right? What's against writing a |
| 15 |
news item about stabilizing Python? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Jacob |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
"For then there will be great distress, unequaled |
| 21 |
from the beginning of the world until now — and never |
| 22 |
to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut |
| 23 |
short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the |
| 24 |
elect those days will be shortened." |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Are you ready? |
Archives