1 |
On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 00:17, Brad Laue wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 17:46, Benjamin Podszun wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > You upgraded to Apache2? I guess (hope?) that you don't talk about |
5 |
> > production environments? I tried to use Apache2 with PHP twice and |
6 |
> > wouldn't recommend it to anyone.. It's just buggy and not usable. As my |
7 |
> > current Gentoo-Servers are.. *cough* |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Hardware configuration? Amount of RAM? Number of CPU's? What specific |
10 |
> revision of gentoo-sources? Have you tried vanilla-sources or alan cox's |
11 |
> patchset? What configuration options had you given the Debian kernel and |
12 |
> do they differ from those you gave to Gentoo's kernel? |
13 |
|
14 |
Uhm.. I did post my hardware, but maybe it wasn't clear enough in all my |
15 |
messages. |
16 |
Compaq-Server, 2 1GHz CPUs, 2GB RAM, no special hardware, apart from |
17 |
Smart Arrays.. |
18 |
Vanilla-sources 2.4.20 |
19 |
|
20 |
Debian: |
21 |
vanilla 2.4.18, built with the "normal" way, no deb-package |
22 |
|
23 |
> Have you tried 2.4.18 under Gentoo to see if it solves your problems? |
24 |
|
25 |
Yes, no difference |
26 |
|
27 |
> This isn't a matter of Debian working and Gentoo not working; there's a |
28 |
> configuration difference between the two, that's all. |
29 |
|
30 |
Yes, I don't doubt it. But I copied the php.ini, apache-config-files and |
31 |
I don't see the difference. The only thing I see is that apache sucks up |
32 |
to 99% CPU (I don't know if it was the same on the Debian system, |
33 |
honestly) and the server stops responding to any requests while the load |
34 |
drops to ~ 0 .. |
35 |
|
36 |
Ben |