Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 06:59:12 -0400
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
> please look up git-bundle before suggesting things like tarballs of
> repos/checkouts.
>

Looks useful.  Wasn't aware that a bundle was something other than a tarball.

We'll probably need to spell out the preferred process in the docs,
and reference it frequently in communications.  Otherwise you'll get
quite a few clones instead.

It appears that devs will have to add the remote for the live
repository after they've cloned the bundle - otherwise they'll just
keep pulling from the bundle which isn't all that convenient.

Rich


Replies:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
References:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Aaron W. Swenson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: multiprocessing.eclass: doing parallel work in bash
Next by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.