Hi,

Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o>:

> Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > Hi everyone
> > 
> > With eapis 1 and 2 we introduced nice features but also a couple of
> > new problems. One of them are the use dependencies when the package
> > you depend on doesn't have the use flag anymore (see [1] for an
> > example).
> > 
> > So I think it's time for a short eapi bump with some distinct
> > improvements:
> > 
> > http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pPAJXP6shYH78lCXeqRqCUQ
> 
> Is there a reason why we should ram through a new EAPI for something
> that *looks* like another "Paludis supports this so let's make it a
> Portage standard" proposal? Is there some kind of time deadline here
> that you all want?

 built_with_use supports exactly that with the --missing switch and
yesterday I noticed some ebuilds that could not be transferred to
EAPI 2 because of that.

> Also, why the bannination of || ( foo? (.).) -- how is it error prone,
> exactly.

 I would like to hear about that, too.

V-Li

-- 
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>