Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Henti Smith <bain@×××××××.za>
To: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
Cc: veldy@×××××.net, aurelien@×××××.org, kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr, gentoo-dev@g.o, manson@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:13:33
Message-Id: 20021217201714.0d651310.bain@tcsn.co.za
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? by Daniel Robbins
1 On 17 Dec 2002 09:10:23 -0700
2 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > I really dislike this whole theme of finding the "culprit," since I
5 > don't think it's helpful. If you're interested, you can view the
6 > ChangeLogs here:
7
8 A typical western attitude. Something is broken/wrong find somebody to blame.
9 Addapt an eastern attidute. Something is broken/wrong fix it no need to blame anybody
10
11 Henti Smith
12
13 --
14 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? Adam Voigt <adam@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>
RE: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? Riyad Kalla <rsk@×××××××××.edu>