Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:05:18
Message-Id: h6nn5q$v9i$2@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay by Nikos Chantziaras
1 On 08/22/2009 05:59 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
2 > On 08/22/2009 05:39 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
3 >> Sebastian Pipping wrote:
4 >>> Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is
5 >>> manual at the moment.
6 >>
7 >> By now a cron-based setup is running syncing the pure-funtoo overlay
8 >> (and therefore also its atom and rss feeds) every 24 hours.
9 >
10 > There seems to be a bit of (minimal) duplication between pure-funtoo and
11 > sunrise.
12
13 Uhm, I just discovered that there are conflicts with portage too. That
14 is not good. After I added pure-funtoo, it messed up my emerge -u world
15 (stuff like wanting to upgrade to sys-apps/baselayout-2.1.5).
16
17 pure-funtoo should not offer packages available in portage (sunrise is
18 the lesser evil).

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@××××××××.org>