| 1 |
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:52:13 +0100 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Again, the proposal comes in two variants: |
| 4 |
> > 2a) It is combined with a one time change of the file extension, |
| 5 |
> > like .ebuild -> .eb. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> And we're going to retroactively migrate the tree or have random file |
| 8 |
> suffixes intermixed? Not to mention we're either keeping two different |
| 9 |
> variants for a longer while, or disregarding backwards compatibility |
| 10 |
> with older package managers for no actual benefit. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
No, you'd just switch extensions for EAPI 5 onwards, and keep the old |
| 13 |
rules for EAPI 4. Same idea and impact as GLEP 55, except without as |
| 14 |
much future proofing. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives