1 |
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 23:44:49 Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:45:03 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:36:59 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:35:11 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
> > > > > And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the |
6 |
> > > > > current situation. |
7 |
> > > > |
8 |
> > > > of course it does. it makes the current situation irrelevant. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > Does this mean we should shortly be expecting to see you do the |
11 |
> > > work to migrate the tree to Git and to automate ChangeLog |
12 |
> > > generation? |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > the tree has already been migrated. automatic ChangeLog generation |
15 |
> > is trivial to implement, and many many projects already have scripts |
16 |
> > to do it. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Including portage's egencache which can generate ChangeLogs from git. |
19 |
> Just a side note. |
20 |
|
21 |
very cool ... wasnt aware of that guy, thanks |
22 |
-mike |