| 1 |
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
| 2 |
<jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> To be clear I support the goal to move our tree to git. |
| 4 |
> However, I'd like to point out that simply moving to git will leave us |
| 5 |
> in the same state. Assuming everyone agrees that git is far more useful |
| 6 |
> than cvs to check for changes in the tree, a simple but important issue |
| 7 |
> remains: the plan is to move the "development tree" to git, but to keep |
| 8 |
> the rsync mirrors for users. So the "move to git" doesn't fix the issue |
| 9 |
> for users or developers using an rsync tree. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Temporarily or permanently? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
One of the huge benefits in using git would be really fast emerge |
| 14 |
--syncs. Not having some kind of system for migrating users to git |
| 15 |
seems like a lot of the benefits are lost. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Matt |
Archives