Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: make opaque list partially translucent?
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 23:03:26
Message-Id: 20030423225234.GI2089@mail.lieber.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: make opaque list partially translucent? by Evan Powers
1 On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 02:37:53PM -0400 or thereabouts, Evan Powers wrote:
2 > But I think I can provide a counter example to the list of stories you
3 > mentioned: the reorganization of ebuild-maintainership into teams, and the
4 > desire to fix the stagnant-bugzilla problem.
5
6 The ebuild-maintainership idea is going to be mentioned in the next GWN --
7 I would have mentioned it in the previous GWN, but it hadn't yet been
8 fleshed out to the point where I thought it was solid enough to take to the
9 community.
10
11 I don't think I've seen too much discussion about the bugzilla problems you
12 alluded too, at least not on -core. I'll scan the archives again before I
13 write the next GWN and, if it's there, I'll summarize it.
14
15 > > Most of the stuff on -core is, well, boring. There's a lot of stuff that
16 > > belongs on -dev -- as others have said, we're working on fixing that.
17 >
18 > If I were a developer, I'd want to field my idea with a smaller group first,
19 > meaning the -core list. But my impression is that once the -core list starts
20 > talking about something, it doesn't get moved to the -dev list. Which is why
21 > I proposed a small group of people (non-devs) assigned the task of relaying
22 > such things to -dev.
23
24 A better solution is making sure we move stuff from -core to -dev without
25 having to be prodded. :) This is something that we need to start doing.
26
27 > Do any of the GWN writers actually have access to the -core list?
28
29 Every "main" news item in the GWN is written by me, personally, so yes.
30
31 > Seemant seemed to say they didn't in his "To the unhappy folks" post,
32 > though he did say you often voluntarily relay stuff (thanks, btw). I just
33 > think that relationship should be formalized somehow.
34
35 It is formalized. Appropriate -core material is summarized and posted in
36 the GWN. We've already identified and acknowledged the fact that the
37 gentoo developers need to do a better job of keeping development stuff on
38 -dev, rather than -core. Give us a chance to work on that.
39
40 --kurt