1 |
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:19:04 -0600 |
2 |
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:06:45 -0300 |
5 |
> Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:15:34 -0400 |
8 |
> > Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert |
11 |
> > > <idl0r@g.o> wrote: |
12 |
> > > > I haven't followed the prev. conversation but what's wrong with |
13 |
> > > > a USE flag for SSE2? We already have SSE2 flags, even global.. |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > That's not it. The flash binary uses SSE2 instructions without |
16 |
> > > checking for their presence, which causes bad things on systems |
17 |
> > > without SSE2. The purpose of the 'sse2check' flag was to die if |
18 |
> > > the system doesn't have SSE2 and print a message telling the user |
19 |
> > > to use an older version of flash. |
20 |
> > > |
21 |
> > > The relevant bug is https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410547 |
22 |
> > > |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > wouldnt adding a sse2 useflag and putting it in REQUIRED_USE solve |
25 |
> > the problem ? |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > afaik portage wont even try to upgrade if people have -sse2 |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I like that, but it doesn't address building on a host not supporting |
30 |
> SSE2 for a target that does. |
31 |
|
32 |
Why? Enable sse2 when cross-"building" and be done. |
33 |
|
34 |
Note: There's no more check via /proc/cpuinfo that way. |
35 |
|
36 |
A. |