Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:39:11
Message-Id: 20060920173620.3c32c331@blashyrk
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited by Simon Stelling
1 On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:36:11 +0200
2 Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me.
5
6 It seems to me to be an attempt to move what is obviously the package
7 manager's job into the tree, and making it far more complex than it
8 needs to be in the process. The necessary metadata is already in
9 ebuilds, and has even been changed to a more depend-like syntax for
10 exactly the purpose of making license handling easier; why duplicate it
11 in so many places?
12
13 The necessary package manager support isn't even all that difficult, so
14 "it's not yet been implemented" seems like a poor excuse for offloading
15 the work onto every single developer instead.
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list