Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: George Shapovalov <george@g.o>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:57:18 +0200
середа, 21. червень 2006 03:46, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò Ви написали:
> On Wednesday 21 June 2006 03:34, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > OK, so we can add qt3 to make.defaults.
> -* says nothing to you? :)
Now I am confused:
My understanding of that proposal was that qt3 is meant to mean "prefer qt3 
over qt4", rather than "enable qt3 unconditionally and see what can be done 
about qt4". So which one is that?
If it is former (preference flag) I do not see aproblem there:
-qt +qt3 = -qt  in such reading.
So, basically the question is about interpretation of -qt +qt3 construct..

George

-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
-- Donnie Berkholz
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
-- Jakub Moc
References:
[RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
-- Stefan Schweizer
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
-- Donnie Berkholz
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
-- Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
Next by thread:
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
Previous by date:
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
Next by date:
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.