Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
середа, 21. червень 2006 03:46, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò Ви написали:
> On Wednesday 21 June 2006 03:34, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > OK, so we can add qt3 to make.defaults.
> -* says nothing to you? :)
Now I am confused:
My understanding of that proposal was that qt3 is meant to mean "prefer qt3
over qt4", rather than "enable qt3 unconditionally and see what can be done
about qt4". So which one is that?
If it is former (preference flag) I do not see aproblem there:
-qt +qt3 = -qt in such reading.
So, basically the question is about interpretation of -qt +qt3 construct..
George
--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
|
| Replies: |
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
-- Donnie Berkholz
|
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
-- Jakub Moc
|
| References: |
[RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
-- Stefan Schweizer
|
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
-- Donnie Berkholz
|
Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
-- Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
|
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Previous by thread: |
| Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4? |
| Next by thread: |
| Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4? |
| Previous by date: |
| Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4? |
| Next by date: |
| Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4? |
|