Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild
Date:	Mon, 03 Oct 2011 05:43:43
Message-Id:	`87zkhiiqan.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"

1	Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> writes:
2
3	> My point is that packages can cause downgrades through "<" dependencies.
4	> There is no rule against it.
5
6	Nearly all of which prevent the upgrade of the dependent package rather
7	forcing the downgrade of an already installed package.