Gentoo Linux -- List Archive: gentoo-dev

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647

List Archive: gentoo-dev

Navigation:

Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >

Headers:

To:	gentoo-dev@g.o
From:	Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
Subject:	So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?
Date:	Sun, 4 Dec 2011 04:50:00 +0100

Subject says it all. More and more bug attachments appear that have
been generated with non-English locales, and it's a nuisance for both
bug reporters and bug wranglers to request/provide the sane alternative
that every developer should be able to read.


     jer

Replies:

Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?
-- James Cloos

Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?
-- Michał Górny

Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?
-- Ryan Hill

Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?
-- Mike Frysinger

Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?
-- Alec Warner

Navigation:

Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >

Previous by thread:

Re: user management mitigation

Next by thread:

Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

Previous by date:

Re: user management mitigation

Next by date:

Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.