On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:38:11 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> > By the way, do we really want to special case eapi-2 in every
> > eclass ? That's lot of code duplication and will get even worse
> > when we'll reach eapi-42. That would have been cool to have a pm
> > function that tells "has my eapi foo support" but that sort of
> > bites its tail that way.
> 
> Hm, what about:
> [ "$(type -t src_configure)" == function ] && EXPORT_FUNCTIONS
> src_configure
> 
> Or is this too fragile or trying to be too clever?

It's illegal, according to PMS. It also won't work with Paludis, since
phase function definitions aren't made available until just before that
phase executes (there is a reason for this -- it provides us with a way
of identifying whether a package has a particular phase or not).

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh