| 1 |
On 02/10/05, R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be |
| 3 |
> included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel |
| 4 |
> in portage. The grub maintainer has been AWOL for the last 9 months or |
| 5 |
> so however, so i guess it's now up to the base-system herd. I was under |
| 6 |
> the impression that feature-adding patches should be sent upstream. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but |
| 9 |
> whatever stirs your pot. ;P |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It makes sense if you're actually using reiser4 for everything else. |
| 12 |
Why bloat your kernel with an extra FS just for /boot? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives