Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Hjalmarsson <xake@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again)
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:53:37
Message-Id: 1263667944.26113.5.camel@lillen.dodi
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) by Sebastian Pipping
1 lör 2010-01-16 klockan 19:16 +0100 skrev Sebastian Pipping:
2 > On 01/16/10 05:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 > > On Friday 15 January 2010 20:55:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
4 > >> On 01/16/10 02:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
5 > >>> the better idea
6 > >>> though would be to split your stuff along the proper lines.
7 > >>>
8 > >>> cache files = /var/cache/layman/
9 > >>
10 > >> as i said: it's not a "normal" cache.
11 > >
12 > > you said but didnt explain why it's "special". these are merely caches of
13 > > external overlays and xml caches of overlay lists.
14 >
15 > to me cache is something that speeds up operation but does not hold
16 > content of real value. with layman overlay "checkouts" that's a bit
17 > different. let's say a host overlay is taken offline: now the layman
18 > copy is my only source. Page [1] describes /var/cache as
19 > "Long term data which can be regenerated". so to me it's not a cache
20 > because there might be data in there that we cannot regenerate.
21 >
22 >
23 That is for the overlays, yeah?
24 But hov about the cache_*.xml files?
25
26 I think what he meant was that should layman really only has one
27 directory? One for cache (downloaded/downloadable lists of overlays?
28 in /var/cache/layman/?), one for the make.conf and overlay.xml
29 (/etc/layman/?) and maybe one more directory for the overlays
30 (/var/lib/layman/?).
31
32 That make.conf/overlay.xml may not go as cache, nor do the overlays
33 themselves, but as I said, should really it all be in the same
34 directory?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o>