Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: justin <jlec@g.o>
Subject: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:42:15 +0100
Hi,

I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add
arches after a "time out". At least not after a such a short one. The
maintainer is responsible for the package, that means it is their
responsibility to decide that a package should go stable. In addition
they have to make the package fit to the standards that the arch teams
request. And I can tell from my own experience it is always more than
the average package has. So as long as you don't review the packages
yourself, consider a different proceeding than this timeout.

Please remove all added arches from the packages maintained by all sci*
teams.

Thanks justin

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
Replies:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Brian Harring
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Agostino Sarubbo
References:
making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Next by thread:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Previous by date:
Re: estack_{push,pop}: cool new helpers or over engineering?
Next by date:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.