Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?)
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:38:33
Message-Id: 90b936c0909040847n2194b22wfccbaf474c84a0f1@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) by Mounir Lamouri
1 On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Mounir Lamouri<volkmar@g.o> wrote:
2
3 > It's even worst when we try to use ACCEPT_LICENSE to have a free
4 > operating system.
5
6 FWIW: Given the state of ebuilds, I think this should never be
7 attempted unless the user knows it may not be accurate[1]. We should
8 not attempt to guarantee such statement, IMO.
9
10 > LGPL-2.1 is free for both but LGPL-2 isn't and we can suppose, most
11 > LGPL-2 licensed packages in the tree are LGPL-2+ actually.
12
13 How are we, the non-lawyer types, suppose to know that? TBH, I don't
14 care and am not going to put much effort beyond reading the header of
15 COPYING or glancing at the HOMEPAGE to see what license they are
16 using. I think you are attempting to add much complexity to ebuilds
17 that will ultimately fail. Of course, you can volunteer to audit every
18 license and every ebuild. Thanks in advance for that =P
19
20 Thanks for putting work into making Gentoo better, I just am not
21 convinced on this subject.
22
23 -Jeremy
24
25 [1]: Look at how long bug 268796 took to get resolved. 4 months,
26 rather quickly too. Ebuilds stated GPL-2, when they were in fact BSD,
27 GPL-3, LGPL-2.