Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] mozilla{-bin}/gecko-sdk masking
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 02:47:49
Message-Id: 1151721841.32429.6.camel@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] mozilla{-bin}/gecko-sdk masking by "Jory A. Pratt"
1 On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
2 > As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
3 > will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause
4 > some issues with stable tree I am aware of this. As packages break
5 > please reference bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137665 If
6 > you are able to provide a patch or diff against problem please provide
7 > and I or the dev/herd that maintaines will test and apply it as soon as
8 > possible.
9 >
10 > I was left with no option as packages are still being updated in the
11 > tree without being ported to seamonkey/firefox. Sorry for any
12 > inconvience this may cause you the user, but devs should be held
13 > responsible as they have had plenty of time to work out the problems.
14
15 I've been using seamonkey for a few weeks now without problems and am
16 pleased with it but I don't believe a word you say about having no
17 choice or devs having the option to fix stuff. You always had the
18 option of porting patches. You always have options! You have held back
19 taking the seadonkey out of p.masking till the very last min then
20 forced an un-smooth upgrade path on everybody. Please don't shift the
21 blame on others.. We have ~arch and blockers for stuff like this...
22
23 Please don't take this as a personal attack... I'm just calling shit as
24 I see it.
25
26
27 --
28 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
29 Gentoo Linux
30
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] mozilla{-bin}/gecko-sdk masking "Jory A. Pratt" <anarchy@g.o>