1 |
On Saturday 11 of September 2010 22:18:32 Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
> On 09/11/2010 11:14 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:10:51 +0300 |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> >>> + |
7 |
> >>> +*hachoir-parser-1.3.4 (10 Sep 2010) |
8 |
> >>> + |
9 |
> >>> + 10 Sep 2010; Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
10 |
> >>> <arfrever@g.o> + -hachoir-parser-1.3.3.ebuild, |
11 |
> >>> +hachoir-parser-1.3.4.ebuild: + Version bump. |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> >> Deleting an older version is relevant so it should also be mentioned in |
14 |
> >> the ChangeLog message. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > It says -hachoir-parser-1.3.3.ebuild. What exactly do you think would be |
17 |
> > gained by adding "Remove old" in this case? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Following your logic we should not write "Version bump" either (as |
20 |
> that's what happens by default when you add a new ebuild). |
21 |
|
22 |
Considering the fact, that ChangeLogs are files that contribute to rsync/cvs |
23 |
fetch the most, it's not that bad idea... |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
regards |
27 |
MM |