1 |
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:13:44 -0400 |
2 |
"Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
5 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
6 |
> |
7 |
> On 07/21/2010 12:11 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
8 |
> > = Alternative A = * first maintainer from the top down gets to be |
9 |
> > assignee, * otherwise the first herd gets to be assignee. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Thanks for the info. Just one point of clarification. How does the |
12 |
> "otherwise" work. If we have herds listed before maintainers, do you |
13 |
> still assign to the first maintainer? In other words, do you only |
14 |
> default to the first herd if there are no maintainers listed at all? |
15 |
|
16 |
* "When metadata.xml lists a single maintainer or herd, then you assign |
17 |
the bug to that maintainer or herd. When the file lists multiple |
18 |
entries, then you assign the bug to the first maintainer, and CC the |
19 |
other maintainer(s) and herd(s). If you find that metadata.xml lists |
20 |
inappropriate and/or confusing contact information, then make a note |
21 |
of that in a comment on the bug report and assign/CC the bug report as |
22 |
optimal as possible."[1] |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
jer |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
[1] |
29 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml#doc_chap4_sect3 |