Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Michał Górny <gentoo@...>
Subject: Re: New eclass: scons.eclass
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:30:12 +0200
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:36:50 +0200
Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@...> wrote:

> If SCons is unpredictable, then don't provide *any* phases and only
> functions and rename it to scons-utils to match its purpose.

It is as predictable as the buildsystem meeting the default phase
functions requirements -- we can configure it, compile it but no way of
knowing what should be done in 'install' for sure.

> What I hate is deliberately introduced inconsistency in ebuild API's.

What I hate is replicating bad practices just because someone else did
that before. If I'm wrong, then please point me the relation between
a particular buildsystem and patching.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

<http://mgorny.alt.pl>
<xmpp:mgorny@...>
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: New eclass: scons.eclass
-- Maciej Mrozowski
References:
New eclass: scons.eclass
-- Michał Górny
Re: Re: New eclass: scons.eclass
-- Maciej Mrozowski
Re: Re: New eclass: scons.eclass
-- Michał Górny
Re: Re: New eclass: scons.eclass
-- Maciej Mrozowski
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: New eclass: scons.eclass
Next by thread:
Re: New eclass: scons.eclass
Previous by date:
Re: New eclass: scons.eclass
Next by date:
Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.