Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:36:50 +0200
Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@...> wrote:
> If SCons is unpredictable, then don't provide *any* phases and only
> functions and rename it to scons-utils to match its purpose.
It is as predictable as the buildsystem meeting the default phase
functions requirements -- we can configure it, compile it but no way of
knowing what should be done in 'install' for sure.
> What I hate is deliberately introduced inconsistency in ebuild API's.
What I hate is replicating bad practices just because someone else did
that before. If I'm wrong, then please point me the relation between
a particular buildsystem and patching.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://mgorny.alt.pl>
<xmpp:mgorny@...>
|
|
