Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
Subject: Re: The Python problem
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:18:04 +0200
Am Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2011, 06:34:52 schrieb Michał Górny:
>
> > As I said it already, we could start doing things simpler in the
> > current python.eclass and maybe that would attract some devs to help
> > out with it, as they find it more comfortable to work with.
> 
> I think it would be better to simply start from scratch with
> a clean python-2.eclass. Instead of adding new features and another lot
> of conditionals for EAPI=4, just make that code a part of new eclass.
> 

Ack. The cleanest way would definitely be to start from scratch, and provide a 
looooong transition period. Please please make things similar compared to the 
other language eclasses, though...

-- 
Andreas K. Huettel (dilfridge)
Gentoo Linux developer
kde, sci, arm, tex


References:
The Python problem
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: The Python problem
-- Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
Re: The Python problem
-- Michał Górny
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: The Python problem
Next by thread:
Re: The Python problem
Previous by date:
Re: rfc: should openrc be mandatory on all gentoo systems?
Next by date:
Re: rfc: should openrc be mandatory on all gentoo systems?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.