| 1 |
On 12/04/2010 12:32, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12 April 2010 12:28, Roy Bamford<neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Last time I looked, his about page complies with our trade mark |
| 5 |
>> requirements. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> But ONLY his about page. Our name and logo guidelines state this needs |
| 8 |
> to happen on each page: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> the website clearly states, on each page, that the project is no official Gentoo project by labelling itself as a "news site", "fan site", "unofficial site" or "community site" |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> See http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/name-logo.xml |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Instead it labels itself as "the Gentoo Wiki" or "the Gentoo Linux |
| 15 |
> Wiki", suggesting to somebody who is unaware of the situation that it |
| 16 |
> is an official project. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are |
| 19 |
wrong. Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is |
| 20 |
to help Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of |
| 21 |
Apple-like litigation when trying to protect it's logo. |
Archives