On 12/16/2011 06:06 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On Friday 16 December 2011 11:42:15 justin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add
>> arches after a "time out". 
> Personally, I agree with have "more stable packages in tree", but I just point 
> out one thing. If me, or another arch tester find ebuild issue(s) and 
> maintainers does not care of it, makes no sense imho. 
>
> I mark stable with a script and I'm uncomfortable to fix them. As Justin said, 
> all maintainers are responsible of their packages, so I'd prefer to not touch 
> other stuff.
>
> If you(for any developers) are busy and/or you can't fix them, feel free to 
> mail me or just give an "ack" via irc and I'll provide to fix.
>
> Regards
> Agostino
Hi ago,

Does your script do any checking on the quality of the ebuild, eg that
it respects C/LDFLAGS.  If so, that's useful and would help package
maintainers to better prepare their ebuilds for stabilization.

And congrats on making dev :)

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail    : blueness@g.o
GnuPG FP  : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88  33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID  : D0455535