Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@g.o>
From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
Subject: using one portage tree for development and portage itself
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:39:18 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

All,

I currently have two copies of the portage tree on my system.

The one that portage itself uses is at /usr/portage, but I have a second copy at /usr/gentoo-x86 which is the one that is checked out of cvs.

Is this the way I should be working, or is there a way to use one copy of the portage tree for both development and portage itself?

Thanks,

William

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBdev2blQW9DDEZTgRAkyHAJ0WBXL1GV2y4OQ3l8qdfgY2+jrVvgCgjJag
QbY+9pmbYxSomPWMBobmhU8=
=dIe9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies:
Re: using one portage tree for development and portage itself
-- Chris Gianelloni
Re: using one portage tree for development and portage itself
-- Donnie Berkholz
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Portage-2.0.51 STABLE TESTING
Next by thread:
Re: using one portage tree for development and portage itself
Previous by date:
Re: Installation Problem
Next by date:
Re: using one portage tree for development and portage itself


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.