1 |
On 26 June 2011 23:40, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> I think we should avoid changing the fundamental design of portage, |
4 |
> such as removing categories or allowing tags to be used as |
5 |
> dependencies/etc. At least, not right now. If we set up namespaces |
6 |
> for tags that might allow for such a thing in the future. |
7 |
|
8 |
At this time I vehemently oppose the idea of using tags for dependencies. |
9 |
|
10 |
If there was even a good reason to do this, I would probably want to |
11 |
see the system working really well first. |
12 |
|
13 |
> The main driver behind tags seems to be searchability, and I think |
14 |
> that is something we could easily improve. |
15 |
|
16 |
+1 |
17 |
|
18 |
> I don't think we should |
19 |
> hold that up over an initiative to completely re-architect Gentoo... |
20 |
|
21 |
+1 |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Kent |
25 |
|
26 |
perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, |
27 |
3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" |
28 |
|
29 |
http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz |