1 |
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:02:57 +0100 |
2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> First, standardise sets. We probably want to go with a format along |
5 |
> the lines of: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> eapi = 4 |
8 |
> description = Monkeys |
9 |
|
10 |
A 'type' field would be useful as well, to support various kinds of |
11 |
package sets (much like portage handles currently). |
12 |
|
13 |
> dev-monkey/howler |
14 |
> dev-monkey/spider |
15 |
> >=dev-monkey/spanky-2.0 |
16 |
> dev-monkey/squirrel |
17 |
|
18 |
We'd either want to add || ( ) here, or somehow explicitly specify that |
19 |
this is a one-of set. |
20 |
|
21 |
> Second, make a bunch of sets named kde-tag, editors-tag, xml-tag, |
22 |
> monkeys-tag etc. |
23 |
|
24 |
I'd go with prefix, not suffix. Should be easier group them together |
25 |
then. |
26 |
|
27 |
> Disadvantages: doesn't use some horribly convoluted system of XML, |
28 |
> wikis and web 2.0. |
29 |
|
30 |
And introduces another dedicated file format the PM has to implement |
31 |
from scratch. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Best regards, |
35 |
Michał Górny |