Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@g.o>
Subject: Re: client+server packages - build which one?
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:31:15 -0400
Roy Marples wrote:
> USE client server
> client - just build the client - duh
> server - just build the server - duh
> client and server OR neither then build both.
> 
> Other packages to possably beneift
> udhcp
> mldonkey
> samhain
> bacula
> boxbackup
> 
finger, telnet and ssh are probably other candidates. (though not too
many people set up boxes without a ssh server these days).

++ to this, I have always found it a little absurd having dhcpd
installed on my laptop just for dhclient.

George Shapovalov wrote:
> Of course this multiplies the number of packages to support, if such situation 
> is common. However the solution you describe can be considered "clean" only 
> after #2272 is finally resolved..
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272
I doubt whether any devs would argue against USE based dependencies.
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: client+server packages - build which one?
-- Luca Barbato
References:
client+server packages - build which one?
-- Roy Marples
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: client+server packages - build which one?
Next by thread:
Re: client+server packages - build which one?
Previous by date:
Sunrise Project -- Open questions post requirement
Next by date:
Re: Re: Project Sunrice: arch team perspective


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.