Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Headers: |
|
To:
|
gentoo-dev@g.o
|
|
From:
|
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
|
|
Subject:
|
Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/cdparanoia: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild
|
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:40:21 -0500
|
|
On Sunday 23 October 2011 09:50:04 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> On Sonntag 23 Oktober 2011 15:34:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use
> > INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree.
> >
> > Do you have any idea how much time me, and aballier spent to make
> > cdparanoia's build system as clean as it is now? And then to coordinate
> > them with upstream xiph.org?
> > Then I see this... Not acceptable by any standards.
>
> I'd like to get my standards up to speed, so may I respectfully ask- what
> is, apart from link time, the Gentoo-user-visible difference between
> * removing the .a files in the ebuild
> * and not building them in the first place?
there is no post-emerge visible difference, but i wouldn't underestimate the
speed of things. for most packages, you're talking about compiling the files
twice (once as PIC and once as not).
-mike
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
|
|