Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:47:28
Message-Id: ea713daae8367f0a80763a7df4786c37@jolexa.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item by Joshua Saddler
1 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:32:37 -0700, Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 >> > But everyone else in Gentoo does, so . . .
4 >>
5 >> Some Gentoo developers/users, who aren't Python maintainers, said that
6 >> they didn't object to have Python 3 installed.
7 >
8 > They're in the minority, judging by the replies in this thread.
9
10 I hate to get into the mix of this, but I suggest researching on "vocal
11 minority" and/or "silent majority" - the most vocal ones on this thread are
12 the minority of the population. I'm not attacking anyone, mind you.
13
14 I haven't expressed anything on this thread but I'm ok with marking it
15 stable and having concerned users mask it. The stages might get kinda funky
16 with both python-2 and 3 on them, but..if they are not BROKEN, I don't
17 care.
18
19 -Jeremy

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>