Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash

[Zac Medico]

On 03/12/2012 10:12 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:05:46 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
>> See above, even if we should ever move away from bash, GLEP 55 is
>> still not needed.
>
> ...but we might as well go with GLEP 55 anyway, since GLEP 55
> definitely works, whereas other solutions might work so long as we
> don't do something unexpected.
>
> This whole thing is just an exercise in trying to find excuses not to
> use GLEP 55.

If we do go with a variant of GLEP 55, I'd prefer a variant that uses a
constant extension (like .eb) and places the EAPI string just after the
version component of the name. For example:

   foo-1.0-r1-eapi5.ebuild
-- 
Thanks,
Zac