1 |
On 03/12/2012 10:12 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:05:46 +0100 |
3 |
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> See above, even if we should ever move away from bash, GLEP 55 is |
5 |
>> still not needed. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> ...but we might as well go with GLEP 55 anyway, since GLEP 55 |
8 |
> definitely works, whereas other solutions might work so long as we |
9 |
> don't do something unexpected. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> This whole thing is just an exercise in trying to find excuses not to |
12 |
> use GLEP 55. |
13 |
|
14 |
If we do go with a variant of GLEP 55, I'd prefer a variant that uses a |
15 |
constant extension (like .eb) and places the EAPI string just after the |
16 |
version component of the name. For example: |
17 |
|
18 |
foo-1.0-r1-eapi5.ebuild |
19 |
-- |
20 |
Thanks, |
21 |
Zac |