On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:15:32 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@...> wrote:

> 2008-07-09 15:45:15 Doug Goldstein napisał(a):
> > Luca Barbato wrote:
> > > Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > >> On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
> > >> Arahesis wrote:
> > >>>> How can you easily revert it in a profile?
> > >>> You can set LDFLAGS="" in a subprofiles's make.defaults.
> > >>
> > >> How elegant... but I guess I'll have no choice.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't possible have a subprofile with compiler/linker
> > > specifics and move there non sharable stuff and keep base leaner?
> > >
> > > lu
> > >
> > I'm just going to commit this to default/linux in about 20 minutes
> > -Wl,-O1
> 
> Cardoe informed me that he planned to add --hash-style=gnu and
> --sort-common to default LDFLAGS in the future.
> 
> Does anybody know any packages / architectures (except mips) which
> have any problems with these flags?

We have versions of glibc pre-2.5 that don't have support
for .gnu.hash.  Can we set a minimum version in the profiles?

No one should be using them, but you never know.

-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662