Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date

[Tim Harder]

On 2011-12-16 Fri 06:05, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > That said, there is probably room for debate over the length of time
> > we leave the bug open.  Maybe a week isn't quite long enough - maybe
> > two weeks is better.

When you do timeout a bug and assign it to arches, it would be great if
you could assign it to *all* previously stable arches, not just x86 and
amd64.

I've reopened a few timed out bugs to add missing arches so arch teams
can either drop keywords or stabilize. That way the tree as a whole can
slowly improve rather then just letting x86/amd64 rocket ahead while
having to keep all the old and often deprecated packages around anyway
for all the other stable arches.

Thanks,
Tim