| 1 |
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Rémi Cardona wrote: |
| 2 |
> Le 27/03/2011 10:36, Samuli Suominen a écrit : |
| 3 |
>> Also, both udisks and upower now have blockers for sys-apps/hal to |
| 4 |
>> prevent overlapping features. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I know you want to kill HAL with a vengeance. I don't disagree with the |
| 7 |
> ultimate goal but I think you've gone too far. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> HAL and u{power,disks} are _perfectly_ parallel installable and there |
| 10 |
> are absolutely _no_ conflicts between the two. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Blockers should be used for _file_ conflicts, not for _feature_ |
| 13 |
> conflicts, otherwise we'd have to mask and get rid of half (or even |
| 14 |
> more) of all the packages we provide in portage. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
latest pciutils blocks hal, so i think that should cover the "urge |
| 17 |
people to migrate" aspect in ~arch |
| 18 |
-mike |
Archives