Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Joshua Saddler posted on Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:27:16 -0700 as excerpted:
> It should be unset; as you say, users should not be screwing with
> system-wide LDFLAGs, as we don't support anything but the defaults.
>
> I put an LDFLAGs FAQ in the optimization guide a long time ago:
>
> section>
> <title>What about LDFLAGS?</title>
> <body>
>
> <p>
> The Gentoo developers have already set basic, safe LDFLAGS in the base
> profiles, so you don't need to change them. </p>
>
> </body>
> </section
I agree with the safe bit, but that "don't need to change them" phrase is
self-evidently false, or Gentoo wouldn't have needed to make the
--as-needed change either. The change didn't magically happen the moment
the need appeared.
(Then again, I never believed that equally self-evidently false "no user
serviceable parts inside" sticker, either. When it's a few screws and a
50 cent fuse, and I'm the user without a microwave as a result...)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
|
|