| 1 |
mån 2001-10-22 klockan 22.05 skrev Dan Armak: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 21 October 2001 22:54, you wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Why can't you have them in /usr/lib/kdelibs-$V (just another dir than |
| 4 |
> > /opt/kde$V). |
| 5 |
> I can. But if I go to the effort of doing this anyway, why not do it for the |
| 6 |
> whole of kde, which will require minimal extra work? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
So what was the scheme you used for /opt/kde$V (to choose the correct |
| 9 |
one?) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > But isn't it just the header-files that is the problem? And not the |
| 12 |
> > libs (or do the libs cause troubles too?) |
| 13 |
> I'm not sure. Even if it's just the headers, the problem is essentially the |
| 14 |
> same as far as I can see. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If the libs don't collide (ie, they are named different) and only the |
| 17 |
headers do then all the kde-libs can be in /usr/lib and the headers has |
| 18 |
to be in /usr/include/kde-$V or something. Then you must have a way of |
| 19 |
choosing the correct include-path but I guess you have to anyway? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
QT/KDE should really solve this issue. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Regards, |
| 24 |
Mikael Hallendal |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Mikael Hallendal micke@×××××××××××.se |
| 28 |
CodeFactory AB http://www.codefactory.se/ |
| 29 |
Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05 Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918 |
Archives