Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/mlt: ChangeLog mlt-0.5.4-r1.ebuild
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:43:16
Message-Id: 20100814144621.4b4169f7@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/mlt: ChangeLog mlt-0.5.4-r1.ebuild by Markos Chandras
1 On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:00:38 +0300
2 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > > you don't need to subscribe, there's usually an AUTHORS file with emails you
5 > > can use...
6 > As I said, I thought that maintainers was responsible to do it since they
7 > follow all the bug progress after all. So according to you I should do all the
8 > work. Tempting
9
10 When you take on the task of fixing a bug in a package you don't maintain,
11 you are responsible for the whole task, not just the part you want to do.
12 You essentially become the maintainer for that change. So just do what you
13 would do if it really was your package.
14
15 And really I don't care if you upstream the patch or not, but when the
16 maintainer politely asks you to do so the correct response is "okay", not "do
17 it yourself".
18
19
20 --
21 fonts, gcc-porting, and it's all by design
22 toolchain, wxwidgets to keep us from losing our minds
23 @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies