Archives
Archives
| From: | George Prowse <george.prowse@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2009.0 profiles | ||
| Date: | Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:48:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4AAAE1B3.7040607@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2009.0 profiles by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 | > ... |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Why not tie the the thing that makes Gentoo unique and one of the major |
| 5 | reasons why users use it to the version numbers - Portage. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | We had 1.2, then 1.4 then 2004.0 and if i'm not mistaken portage is at |
| 8 | 2.1 currently. Tie it in and we have 2.2 (currently masked) next. Add |
| 9 | release candidates along the way and everyone is happy. But i'm sure |
| 10 | there is a million reasons why this is wrong... Bring on the wrath. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | George |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2009.0 profiles | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |