* Re: [gentoo-dev] A few questions to our nominees
@ 2008-06-09 4:35 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2008-06-09 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 665 bytes --]
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:54:46 +0200
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 3. Most wanted changes in future EAPIs
>
> Somebody is thinking the PMS and the EAPI definition as it is are
> wrong and should be replaced since they aren't useful for their
> purpose.
Anyone thinking that has a very limited understanding of how things
work. Let's face it, there hasn't been any correct criticism, and any
complaints have been from people who don't understand what's going on
anyway and who seek to blame EAPI for Portage's lack of progress,
rather than blaming Portage's lack of progress for lack of new EAPIs
as they should.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2008-06-08 9:12 [gentoo-dev] A few questions to our nominees Piotr Jaroszyński
2008-06-08 17:54 ` Luca Barbato
2008-06-09 4:35 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox