Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Morgan Christiansson <sft3905@...>
Subject: Re: Suggestion for updates to dodoc
Date: Mon Sep 24 19:23:01 2001
Daniel Robbins wrote:

>On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:35:11PM +0200, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
>
>>The dodoc command in ebuilds should handle HTML files a lot better than it
>>does now. Instead of naively compressing html files, they should be put
>>/usr/share/doc/${P}/html instead.  This would be a very simple fix, if it
>>wasn't for the fact that we sometimes want to copy entire HTML-trees with
>>image files and all (such as the documentation for python or qt).
>>
>
>I'm ok with doing this; would you be willing to improve dodoc and post your
>improvements here?  As long as they are sane, I doubt anyone will complain
>and I'll roll them into the next version of Portage.
>
>Best Regards,
>
Browsers can handle .html.gz, but the links will need to be modified.

Also i noticed that mozilla 0.9.4 prompt's to save files by default, i 
know that it can handle gzip comressed content however.




References:
Suggestion for updates to dodoc
-- Karl Trygve Kalleberg
Re: Suggestion for updates to dodoc
-- Daniel Robbins
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Suggestion for updates to dodoc
Next by thread:
dodoc and /usr
Previous by date:
RE: More on: Install problem with new box. help please.
Next by date:
Re: Install problem with new box. help please.


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.