1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Dne 25.1.2011 13:25, Markos Chandras napsal(a): |
5 |
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:13:06PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
6 |
>> How about creating a project (possibly a subproject of QA or something |
7 |
>> else) that would help people do that? In case of no response from |
8 |
>> maintainers just do your job, and that should get the tree converted |
9 |
>> more quickly than setting a policy. |
10 |
> Please don't! QA is way too understaffed. We ain't gonna convert any |
11 |
> ebuilds. This has nothing to do with QA. Let maintainers handle this |
12 |
Pavel does not ask for us to migrate the ebuilds, but the eclasses, wich |
13 |
we do anyway now :) |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> My main point is that said "X should be Y" does not automatically make |
16 |
>> it so. We'd have to think about the migration plan anyway. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Paweł |
19 |
>> |
20 |
> @Tomas, I don't follow. You mean migrate existing ebuilds or use the |
21 |
> latest EAPI from now on? |
22 |
> |
23 |
God no, when you do bump you use new eapi :) not retroactively revert |
24 |
all ebuilds to latest. |
25 |
|
26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
27 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
28 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
29 |
|
30 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk0+wtoACgkQHB6c3gNBRYe0lACeI/ir1DEcoxIpL/l0TEjDr5IZ |
31 |
smQAn2ydpf013aaqR94t7A6MYb7nkslF |
32 |
=j9iM |
33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |