Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: "Steev Klimaszewski" <steev@g.o>
Subject: "Slacking" arches - which are stable, which aren't?
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:26:58 -0500
Not wanting to start a huge war about what arches are slacking and
which aren't - I asked in -dev on IRC and was told to check out
profiles.desc - based on this information, I closed Bug 208917 which
was about stablizing dbus-glib-0.74.  The bug was opened on 04 Feb
2008, and as of today 05 Oct 2008, the only arches left to stable it
are arm, sh, and s390 (and according to profiles.desc, they are all
dev profiles) however hoffie said that didn't seem right since he
knows things get requested for stable for those arches.

So, IS there a definitive list somewhere of what arches are stable,
and which aren't, and if so, where can it be found?  I have no problem
re-opening the bug, but as I stated in -dev, its been almost 8 months
since the last *activity* on the bug, and I doubt that they are going
to be stabling it any time soon.

Thoughts? Helps?


Replies:
Re: "Slacking" arches - which are stable, which aren't?
-- Friedrich Oslage
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-lang/python: ChangeLog python-2.6.ebuild python-2.5.2-r6.ebuild
Next by thread:
Re: "Slacking" arches - which are stable, which aren't?
Previous by date:
Re: Re: bzr.eclass into Portage
Next by date:
Re: Projects without a homepage, and valid contents of HOMEPAGE (per bug 239268)


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.