1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 27/03/12 04:04 AM, Ian Whyman wrote: |
5 |
> On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |
7 |
>> wrote: |
8 |
>>>> Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use |
9 |
>>>> Bugzilla's XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> XML-RPC is shit. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:REST_API |
14 |
>> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Shame that it requires custom patches to BZ, personally I think |
17 |
> the preferable (and offically supported) method would be |
18 |
> JSON-RPC[1] |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Ian |
21 |
> |
22 |
> 1.http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.0/en/html/api/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.html |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
What about all of the above? :D Shouldn't be hard to use the various |
26 |
support libs to dump the request object to either format, right? |
27 |
|
28 |
(no, i'm not volunteering) |
29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
30 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
31 |
|
32 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAk9xxhoACgkQAJxUfCtlWe0nVwEA6DIm5IcHaxZuFUZz7ETOq8o3 |
33 |
zzVOBJqP84SY+FQv8xkBALlNtfKSgQLPR0Qoyc3/nUqt8hAuvOF0jOIEx9r0FVMm |
34 |
=wYwb |
35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |